Describe marketing situations in which the use of qualitative research methods would be appropriate Essay Example for Free

Describe marketing situations in which the expenditure of soft research methods would be appropriate EssayDescribe marketing situations in which the use of qualitative research methods would be appropriate. According to Zikmund, Ward, Lowe, Winzar, Babin Qualitative research is a methodology that elaborate interpretations of phenomenal of delight with expose depending on numerical measurement ( Zikmund, Ward, Lowe, Winzar, Babin, 2011, pg 65 ) . It is characterised by its aims, which relate to understanding some aspect of genial life, and its methods which generate words, rather than numbers, as data for analysis ( Patton, Cochrain, 2002 ) .In terms of marketing situations, qualitative research methods are appropriate to be used when the organization root for new product whim generation and development, strength and weaknesses of products/ brands and studying emotions and attitudes on societal and public affairs issues (qrca. org). To maximize understanding on the situation , there are two qualitative research methods that can be consider is Focus Groups and Questionnaires.With these methods, we signalise the benefits as well as limitations of using these research methods. Focus groups can be define as an unstructured, free-flowing interview with a small group of people ( Zikmund, Ward, Lowe, Winzar, Babin, 2011, p71) . An approximately 60 to 90 minute countersign is led by a trained moderator with 8 to 12 relatively homogenous but unacquainted(predicate) individuals who are brought together to deal a specific topic ( Gunn, 2004) .Focus groups allow people to discuss their feelings, anxieties and frustrations, as well as the depth of their convictions, in their own words ( Zikmund, Ward, Lowe, Winzar, Babin, 2011, p72 ) . The benefits of focus groups can be presented for an in-depth exploration of new ideas, opinions, perceptions, and reactions to concepts and messaging. Focus groups often serve as exploratory research to assist check over design of subsequent quantitative research methods.Similarly, they can also be useful in validatory and/ or clarifying results garnered from previous quantitative research and can be use to elicit in their own words descriptions of products, services or issues being discussed. Conferences and other events present relatively low-cost opportunities to sway focus groups with target audiences. There slant to be few interviewer effects on dialog because individuals tend to be influenced more by the group discussion than by the moderator.Participants are usually enthusiastic and ad-lib in their responses and groups tend to naturally cover more questions, opinions and comments than researchers could have anticipated. The disadvantage of the focus group even shows that the results from focus groups are qualitative and nonprojectable to larger populations. They require well-trained moderators to manage discussions, maintain focus, and minimize affects of the personalities and behaviours of ind ividual participants on others and/or the entire group.Logistical and cost considerations include room and food set-up, and incentives are typically compulsory to encourage response. Questionnaires are not among the most prominent methods in qualitative research, because they commonly require subjects to act to a stimulus, and thus they are not acting naturally. However, they have their uses, especially as a government agency of collecting education from a wider precedent than can be reached by personal interview. Though the information is necessarily more limited, it can still be very useful.For example, where certain clearly defined facts or opinions have been identified by more qualitative methods, a questionnaire can explore how generally these apply, if that is a matter of interest. Ideally, there would then be a qualitative check on a sample of questionnaire replies to see if respondents were interpreting items in the way intended. Alternatively, a questionnaire might be used in the first instance, followed by qualitative techniques on a sample as a check and to fill out certain features of the questionnaire replies. Interaction among techniques in this way is typical of qualitative research.