Management of pre menstrual syndrome

Management of pre menstrual syndromeThis chapter give births a brief account of display study conclusion which is draw from the findings. The implication is highlighted in various areas- nursing practice, nursing education, nursing formation and nursing research. And also it clarifies the limitations, suggestions and gives recommendation for future study.SUMMARY OF THE STUDYThe target of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Planned treat Intervention on management of Pre Menstrual Syndrome (premenstrual syndrome) in terms of intensity of tokens, knowledge and perspective among college girls in a conveyed educational institution, Salem.Rosenstochs Health Belief Model was selected as conceptual frame work for this study. An evaluative approach, pre experimental one assort pre test, post-test was used for the study. Non probability purposive sampling technique was used to select the samples and the samples size was 30.Tools were made from book references, net refere nces and previous experiences of the researcher. Content rigourousness obtained from 5 experts (3 nursing and 2 medical personnel) Reliability of the tool was estimated by split half method for knowledge questionnaire r= 0.82, Likerts scale by split half method r= 0.82, it shows that the tool was reliable.After which a pilot study was conducted among 3 samples. Fol impoverisheding that actual data accretion was done with the same tool. On day 1, the researcher screened 100 college girls with check tool to know no. of them experiencing PMS. It revealed that out of 100, 64 of them had PMS, among them 30 of them were recruited as samples as majority of them had 5 or more than 5 symptoms (3 carnal and 1emotional and 1 behavioural symptom). Following that from the recruited samples pre-test was done. Demographic data was collected by self report method and intensity of symptoms was assessed exploitation (0-10) Numerical order Scale, knowledge was assessed with structure knowledge q uestionnaire and attitude of PMS was assessed employ the 5 points Likerts scale. On the same day researcher taught planned nursing preventative on management of PMS for about 20-30 minutes. A pamphlet was disposed emphasizing on specific measures of PMS management. Along with that a dismission dairy was given to each individual to specify the symptoms and their intensity during PMS for consecutive 3 racks. On 15th day post-test was carried out using the same tools A concise data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics.MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE STUDYI. Demographic VariablesThe analysis shows that 73.33% were in the age group of 21-25 years.Based on family monthly income 53.3%were under the course of 2001 5000 rupees.Those who attained menarche at the age group of 13-14 were 73.34%In regards to food habits 76.67% were non vegetarian.Regarding burden in kg about 73.34% were in the group of 41-60 kilogramAmong samples 56.67% of them inform that their sisters had family h/o PMS.100% says that they dont take own medicationsDuring PMS 90%says that they dont take any home remediesII. Findings related to Effective Planned Nursing Interventiona) Intensity of symptomsMajority of symptoms experienced by samples were (Abdominal cark, pimples, tiredness, irritability, inadequate sleep, anxiety, irritability, low grit suffering)Least experienced symptoms were (Diff in concentrating, joint ail, calf muscle pain, knocker tenderness, headache, nausea, palpitation, mood swing, withdrawal from environment, food craving, swelling of extremities, fever). Description of each symptom which was experienced by more than 10 samples were discussed as followsIn pre-test abdominal pain was relegate for 25 samples among that 36.00% had mild pain, 28.00% had unemotional pain, 28.00% had severe pain and 8.00% had intolerable pain. In I daily round abdominal pain was extradite for 23 samples among them 44.44% had mild pain, 44.44% had discuss pain, and 1 1.12% had severe pain. In II roulette wheel 22 samples had abdominal pain, among them 45.45% had mild pain, 40.90% had moderate pain 13.64% had severe pain. In terce cycle 76.19% had mild pain, 14.29% had moderate pain and 9.52% had severe pain.In pre-test pimples were present for 21 samples among them 50.00% had mild, 35.00% had moderate and 15.00% had severe. In I cycle Pimples were present for 21 samples among them 61.90% had mild, 33.34% had moderate and 4.76% had severe. In II cycle 6.50% had mild, 25.00% had moderate, 5.00% had severe and 5.00% had Intolerable. In III cycle 19 samples had pimples among them 78.95% had mild, 15.78% had moderate and 5.27% had severe.In pre-test tiredness were present for 20 samples among them 40.00% had mild, 60.00% had moderate. In I cycle tiredness were present for 18 samples among them 50.00% had mild, 50.00% had moderate. In II cycle 18 samples had tiredness in that 66.66% had mild, 33.34% had moderate. In III cycle 15 samples had tirednes s in that 73.34% had mild, 26.66% had moderate.In pre-test anger was present for 15 samples among them 53.33% had mild, 20.00% had moderate and 26.67% had severe anger. In I cycle anger was present for 13 samples among them 69.24% had mild, 23.07% had moderate and 7.69 had severe. In II cycle 11 samples had anger in that 63.34% had mild, 36.36% had moderate. In III cycle 8 samples had anger in that 50.00% had mild, 50.00% had moderate.In pre-test inadequate sleep was present for 13 samples among them 53.85% had mild, 30.77% had moderate and 15.38% had severe. In I cycle inadequate sleep was present for 11 samples 54.55% had mild, 45.55% had moderate. In II cycle 11 samples had inadequate sleep, among them 54.55% had mild, 45.45% had moderate. In III cycle 100.00% had mild.In pre-test anxiety was present for 12 samples among them 41.67% had mild, 41.67% had moderate and 16.66% had severe. In I cycle anxiety were present for 11 samples among them 36.66% had mild, 63.64% had moderate. In II cycle 36.66% had mild, 63.64% had moderate. In III cycle 9 samples had anxiety among them 22.22% had mild, 55.56% had moderate and 22.22% had severe.In pre-test irritability was present for 11 samples among them 45.45% had mild, 36.37% had moderate and 18.18% had severe. In I cycle irritability was present for 12 samples among them 58.33% had mild, 33.33% had moderate and 8.34% had severe. In II cycle 11 samples had irritability in that 54.55% had mild, 45.45% had moderate. In III cycle 9 samples had irritability in that 88.88% had mild, 11.12% had moderate.In pre-test low bet on pain was present for 10 samples among them40.00% had mild pain, 10.00% had moderate pain, 30.00% had severe pain and 20.00% had intolerable pain. In I cycle low back pain was present for 10 samples 40.00% had mild pain, 40.00% had moderate pain, and 20.00% had severe pain. In II cycle 10 samples had Low back pain, among them 50.00% had mild pain, 10.00% had Low back pain 40.00% had severe pain. In II I cycle 44.44% had mild pain, 11.12% had moderate pain and 44.44% had severe pain.There were significant differences between the pre-test and the post-test level of intensity. The interest symptoms have significant difference from pre-test to I cycle pre-test to III cycle. whence the alternate hypothesis H1 was accepted.b) Knowledge on management of PMSIn pre-test Knowledge scores was 53.34% had inadequate knowledge, 43.33% had moderate knowledge and 3.33% had adequate knowledge. In post-test Knowledge scores was 13.33% had moderate knowledge and 86.67% had adequate knowledge.The overall hateful pre-test knowledge was (50.50% with SD 2.49) and ranged 6-15. The overall mean post-test knowledge was (79.65% with SD 1.93) ranged 12-19.The paired t protect was significantly higher than the (9.966 t29=2.045)at p t29=2.045)at p